One year later

I make fewer phone calls.

But more of them are to my dad.

I cry a little more.

But not that much more.

I hold on a little tighter.

But I have more worth holding tight.

I’ve lost the family member closest to me.

But my family has grown wildly.

I can’t not watch The Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood.

But it feels good to cry at the end.

I am a little more worn.

But a little less weary.

A little stronger and a little less strained.

One year later, the memories are almost, just nearly enough.

Rest in peace, Mom. I love you.

Another reunion

Somewhere between here and Atlanta, there’s a skinny blonde woman driving too fast in heels that would make my spine crumple in protest after about three and a half minutes.

Said skinny blonde was my roommate for a year out in Dublin, California. In the 90s.

I still can’t say that without laughing a little. I had a roommate. As a grown-up. In a decade that has wormed its way onto the classic rock playlist.

Because Pearl Jam totally belongs with the Rolling Stones? Meh…well, maybe.

Anyway.

Tammy and I worked together at Electro-Test, Inc., where I was a long-term temp (doing various admin and marketing work that taught me to never have anything to do with trade shows again) and she worked in accounting. I needed a new home at about the time her roommate was moving out, so a mutual friend hooked us up and the rest is faded and frequently misremembered history.

I was unaware then that this friendship would last a freaking DECADE.

I mean, seriously? On paper, we don’t make any sense. We’re nine years apart in age. I’m the stay-home-with-a-good-book type and Tammy can dance all night and still look fabulous rolling in for breakfast. We’re worlds apart on make-up and hair and general appearance upkeep — thank god we had our own bathrooms. She smoked, I didn’t. (She might still…I don’t know.)

And, oh, our decorating styles? Not. Even. Close. Dude, I banged my knees on the corners of that goddamned glass coffee table so many times, I almost wished someone at one of our parties would get lit and smash through it.

No such luck.

Plus? She kept acquiring pets that could eat my pets. I kept rats, back then, and they were the first pets to enter the apartment. Tammy brought home a bearded lizard she named Drazil. Then she rescued a cat we dubbed Maestro after the local bar.

We weren’t the perfect roommates — when the lease was up, we went our separate ways. This isn’t an opposites attract story.

This was the year that taught me (eventually, in retrospect) that people don’t have to have anything in common to really enjoy and care about each other, and that people with a lot in common can be crueller to each other than they would be to an enemy. (With an enemy, you fight fair.)

It was also the year I learned to make strawberry daiquiris with coconut rum. Good lord, have you ever had those? It’s like drinking those lovely red-and-white-swirled candies, only eventually you fall over and your liver swims up and sticks a little white flag out your ear.

I don’t know how many parties we had. It seems like so many, but it couldn’t have been, right? I mean, Halloween was the really big one (I was a jester with rosy cheeks and Tam was Tina fucking Turner — SEE?!), and it was on Friday night, after work. That was the one where we went kind of all out and I made ghosts out of white fabric and papier-mache goop, and we lit the whole house with candles. Even the bathroom!

Which was a colossally stupid idea, let me tell you. Our place got SO hot. And that jester costume included a hat, and I wore it over a black bodysuit. Oh! And with my black suede boots — tall, but flat, and totally in style again — with little bells I’d sewn on the toes.

Tammy/Tina, of course, could just be all fabulous and flash her jean jacket open to cool down.

The next morning, we woke up dead. Tore up, as they say, from the floor up. (Tam was the first to teach me that phrase, in her lovely Georgia Peach accent.) Nothing, praise dear sweet Baby Jesus, had gone up in flames from all the candles, and I don’t think anyone did anything that came back to haunt them later (which was not the case for the previously thrown Labor Day party, of which we shall not speak).

The kitchen floor was wicked sticky, though. Seriously sticky with stuff stuck to it. We hoped it was just from spilled drinks, but…no, we were pretty sure. It seemed like it would take three attempts to mop it clean, though.

Plus? We were dead. Who would come back from the dead to mop a floor?

The year before, I’d gone into the Castro for Halloween, and I told Tammy about it in my morning-after monotone — about the outrageous costumes, the huge but safe crowd, the gorgeous drag queens who towered over me, and how I’d seen Jesus three times in one night. She was enthralled. (Being from Georgia, she was a little short on drag queen experiences.)

We rallied, and looked at the kitchen floor.

“Fuck it,” we said, then donned our costumes and headed for the city.

***

The plan for this reunion weekend is somewhat loose. Depending on when she gets in, we may have dinner downstairs at my usual place.

Tomorrow, we’ll stroll the Avenue. She’ll go apeshit and spend a paycheck in the doggy boutique and bakery I haven’t even told her about yet. I suspect we’ll have lunch at Cheesetique and pick up a selection of yummies for the evening.

Tomorrow night, Rick Springfield will be on Californication, playing himself. If one of us remembers, we’re totally watching it. Rick did a show at Maestro — I didn’t go, but Tammy did, and talked about it forever, so it’s LIKE I WAS THERE. Obviously, we must watch the show.

Tomorrow night may also be when we haul out the old photos (which G reminds me are not “pics” because they do not yet exist in digital form).

Sunday, we’ll be at Perry’s for the drag brunch, then we’ll hit Old Town. We could do a bit of siteseeing in between, I suppose…then a leisurely dinner at a local place.

I haven’t seen Tammy in six years — the last time was my wedding day, and I was stressed out and…busy. (She did swing dance with my dad, though. That was amusing.) I’m pretty sure this visit will be more fun.

The ‘hood

Last night, I abruptly ended a phone call with G at about 9:30 because I heard a woman screaming in the parking lot.

A woman. Screaming. 9:30. PM.

I went out on the balcony, hoping it was just kids playing around, but it wasn’t. It was a young woman — younger than me, certainly, but old enough to be dressed for office work – screaming for someone to help her. She was coming toward the entrance from the side of the lot that borders my own building.

She was staggering.

I don’t think I’ve ever used that word to describe to a sober person’s movement.

Eventually, her legs buckled and she sat on the curb.

She said she’d been attacked, that a man had taken her bag, grabbed her arm and thrown her to the ground. Then he ran off. I don’t know if he ran off because he onlywanted the bag, or if he ran off because she started screaming.

I wasn’t the first to call 911 — the dispatcher said a car was on its way. By the time I got off the phone, the officer was pulling in and there were four or five people gathered around the woman. I didn’t go downstairs…I wasn’t sure how I could help without being in the way, not having seen the incident at all.

I could have brought a blanket down, though. I thought of that later. She only had a skirt and blouse on.

This is the seventh and most serious recent incident that I know about; since June, we have been getting somewhat frequent notices about increased vehicle break-ins and theft, and there have been reports of people (presumed homeless) sleeping in the stairwells.

Management, when asked pointedly, said they are “looking into” installing more site lighting, installing cameras, and hiring a temporary [Mall Cop].”

They had other terms for the Mall Cop, but it comes down to uniformed, unarmed person patrolling the area and Looking Official. I mean I’m not expecting Walker, Texas Ranger to stand guard – uniformed and unarmed is reasonable for building security.

It’s the “looking into” and “temporary” that bother me. I live by myself, I go to work early, and I come home late at least twice a week, and we’ve already discussed how I’m a statistically likely target. And hey, we turn the clocks back this weekend, which means it’ll be dark when I get home no matter what. Given an average of two “incidents” a month and the fact that the latest involved violence, I don’t think it’s too much to ask for a better-lit parking lot and 24-hour security cameras.

Because, let’s face it, a guy in a uniform is no more of a deterrent than a camera, and a system of cameras can be everywhere at once and record everything in range. Not even Chuck Norris can do that.

What do you think? What is building management’s responsibility here?

(The moral of the story, by the way? Be ready and willing to scream bloody murder. And learn to punch people in the neck.)

Straight, not narrow

I saw Milk this weekend.

I don’t know why I waited. I remember thinking it was one of those movies that didn’t really require the Big Screen to have an impact on me.

(Unlike Harry Potter and the Star Wars prequels. Those needed the biggest screen possible. Quidditch and lightsabres!)

It does deserve a Big Audience…although it just isn’t the kind of film that changes people’s minds about something as scary as The Gay. (I don’t know what kind of film would. Brokeback Mountain certainly didn’t.)

Me? I’m the choir on this issue. I cried at the end, but not because Milk and Moscone got shot. I cried because it’s been 30 years since that happened — enough time for a whole generation to grow up scared and unsure, facing prejudice and being told there’s something wrong with them. (Not everyone…but one is too many.)

Thirty years after Harvey Milk, we have made only the most incremental movement toward equal rights for all of our citizens, regardless of whom they love.

And every day, legislators across the country are fighting to deny Americans their civil rights…or deny their existence at all (really, Marion Barry?). Every day, people who, for the most part, say they worship a god who says “love thy neighbor” also say they don’t believe the LGBT community deserves to have legally supported families (regardless of a legally binding Power Of Attorney, in this case).

Thirty years later, I have a dear friend who is still fighting in his state, day in and day out, just to have the same rights that I have, and I’m not even the most privileged in our society. (I’m close, but I lack the…basic equipment.) It is nonsensical that I could legally marry the wrong guy and he can’t legally marry the right one.

Unless he moves. But he does seem to love his state. :)

I’m so proud of his fight and the effect he’s had, the alliances he’s made over the last 10 years. More than that, though, I’m in awe of his grace in the face of so much hatred, still…30 years after Harvey Milk fought to show us that we all know, and probably love, someone who’s gay and has been afraid or unable to tell us.

***

Eleven years ago, Matthew Shepard was beaten and killed for being gay. He was “taught a lesson.” It’s taken the U.S. government this long to pass the Hate Crimes Prevention Act in his name, adding “actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability” to the 1969 law that increases sentences for crimes committed on the basis of “actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or sex.”

And 28 elected officials opposed it. The most frequently voiced worry is that a law like this will silence pastors and others who preach against The Gay. For the record, this bill, which will be signed into law, will not prevent anyone from thinking anything about anyone else.

It will punish them a little harder for beating people up based on those opinions, though. This law will further define — for those who cannot make the distinction — the basic law that no one has the right to hurt someone else, even if that someone else is “other.”

Why do we need this kind of law? Because 11 years after Matthew Shepard, and 30 years after Harvey Milk, people still get beat up for being gay. I would love to live in a world where this law isn’t necessary, but right now? In the land of the free and home of the brave? We need it. And I’ll consider myself lucky to live to see the day when we don’t.

Conservative pastors and others advocating against The Gay (as if they’re recruiting?), you have the right to believe whatever you believe for whatever reasons you name. And I have the right to believe that people are beautiful, just as they are, until hate — not love — makes them ugly.

So, LGBT community, let me welcome you to federal “protected class” status. I’m really sorry you deserve it, but I’m glad you’ve got it.

I think Harvey would be, too.

The case of the useless thermostat

According to the thermostat in my bedroom, the temperature is 80 degrees.

My living room is also warmer than I would like, although the temp falls somewhere between 70 and 80 degrees. (I’m most comfortable between 65 and 70.)

I have had the heat switched off, on the thermostats and on the individual room units, since Wednesday night, and yet the temperature hasn’t changed, even with my heat shut off.

“Well,” thought I, “perhaps my downstairs neighbors like living in a sauna and leave their heat blaring all day. Or perhaps there’s still a malfunction in the system somewhere, given that there was such difficulty in getting it switched on this year.”

I asked management what was going on. Here is what I was told:

You have hot water that builds up in your coils inside your unit. With the fan on, the air will push out the heat. When the fan is off you will still have warmth coming from the system as the hot water is still in the coils just not as harsh as with the fan. We can turn the valve off for you ,which will cool the water in the coils. However if you want heat later on you must let us know to turn the valve on during normal business hours.

 Would you like the valve off?

(In roughly that shade of green, too, which I’ve reproduced here because I REALLY hate clever email color changes. I know someone who uses light blue against white on response emails, and that OFFENDS my usability sensi…bilities.)

My response:

No, I would not like the valve shut off. I would like to control the temperature of my home with the dials on the thermostats.

The follow-up response, before the phone call that “settled” the matter:

Also the thermostat is just an on and off switch from the wall. The temp is controlled at the boilers downstairs.

It’s an old building, she explained on the phone. There’s no local control of the temperature.

Wha? What, what, whaaaa? The dial on the thermostat in each room is just an illusion of control? The actual temperature throughout my home has nothing to do with my comfort level, even though there’s a knob for me to fiddle with?

Jesus, it’s just like the meeting rooms at work.

What’s funny is that the heating unit does seem to respond to knob-fiddling. If I turn the knob to a higher number, the unit starts spewing hot air. If I dial it back, it stops. It the heat is “on,” the hot air doesn’t blow nonstop…

So, is management wrong? Or is it more complicated than that?

Anyway.

They’re going to show me how to turn the valve off myself, just in case, but really, the ambient heat that comes out when the fan is off isn’t the problem. NOT BEING ABLE TO CONTROL THE TEMPERATURE IN MY HOME is the problem. Being lulled into believing I have some control by a misleading device is the problem. (I need to go back to the flyer they sent out about “how to keep energy bills down” and see if it says anything about setting the thermostat at a lower temperature…if so, it’s one of a couple of issues I’d like to report to the Better Business Bureau.)

(I do keep all the flyers they send out. I like documentation, and I knew when I moved in that this building tends to screw things up.)

I recommended they take a more honest approach and change all the thermostats to plain on/off switches. I’m sure they’ll take that under advisement. (/sarcasm)

I mean, the good news is that I have a home that’s heated…I have a hunch this is going to be a nasty winter.

The bad news is that, every time something like this happens, my longish-term plan of staying put until I’m ready move into a semi-permanent, all-around nicer place (long-term rental or –gulp– a purchased home) gets jolted. I love my neighborhood and my home…I just hate dealing with the building issues.

Oh, and I hate the pool. While I’m at it. It’s a dumb affectation of a pool. Like the thermostat.

Rebuilding my village

The anniversary of Mom’s death is approaching, and I find myself in a very contemplative and emotional place most of the time. As the duties of managing the estate wind down, I find that “moving forward” isn’t quite what I thought it would be.

It’s better, mostly. Instead of growing pains, it feels more like self-inflicted turbulence upon re-entry.

I thought I had it all figured out. I had this experience of family that I thought was complete. What I didn’t realize was that, although my experience of family wasn’t exactly wrong, it had been manipulated. It was incomplete, and a lot of what I felt growing up resulted from that incompleteness.

See, Mom wanted to be the favorite. (So did her mother, I’ve been told, and where else do we learn how to be?) She wanted to be the favorite child, the favorite sister, the favorite parent, the favorite aunt. She liked being the cool mom, the fun mom, and wanting to be that extended to wanting her side of the family to be viewed that way, as well.

Proximity helped. When KidBrother and I and all of our cousins were little, our two sets of grandparents lived three miles apart on one dirt road. I remember things being more even then — most of the trips to Lake Dunmore (Branbury Beach) were with Mom’s family, but there were plenty of weekend afternoons and family dinners at Memere and Pepere’s farm.

(I didn’t know this until I found another baby book, but my first 4-word sentence was “Want to ride Cleo.” Cleo and Ginger were the horses-in-residence at the farm, the long-time companions of Uncle Paul and Aunt Sue.)

Then Pepere died and Memere moved into town, and the whole family started to spread out a bit. Mom built up the shop and worked long hours, and we built the pool and spent more time in that than at the lake. By virtue of being nearby, the Whipples were always around more often.

And then we moved, too…and Mom moved back, eventually for good. I can recognize why, when we all came back to visit from California, she would want to spend as much time as possible with her side of the family. Expanding on that, “more time with her side of the family” became more time with her when I was the only one still living out of state.

It wasn’t that she campaigned actively against the Gingras side. She just…supported affection for her family and encouraged the idea that they were the fun ones, the ones who knew us best, the ones who were comfortable and accepting. She encouraged us to visit Memere, but only out of obligation: “She’s your grandmother.” It was a chore, that way, and she would magnanimously let us off the hook from it sometimes, even though we were adults.

I don’t know how much of that was deliberate, and it doesn’t really matter now.

I’m realizing now, though – or remembering — how much fun Dad’s side of the family was when I was a kid, and why.

The “why” is what bothers me.

I’ve always said that the reason I stayed in California, the reason I fought to stay out there even as Mom was trying to get us to go back to Vermont, is that I was comfortable being myself out there. In Vermont, around Mom’s family, I tended to be the only one who liked school (loved it, really), who would rather read than play outdoors.  I wasn’t afraid of tests and I generally did my homework. I latched onto the first computer that showed up in the classroom.

I was just…different. Nerdy.

It wasn’t just in Mom’s family. At sixth grade graduation, each person in my class of 20 got a pin labeling us for how we’d been known. Some of the boys got “Leader.” Some got “Athlete,” I think. Jenny Roberts got “Artist” (which…duh).

I got “Bookworm.”

It’s not like it wasn’t true. The elementary school librarian gave me my library “card” when I left (the list of the books I’d checked out in the six years I’d been there) — it was about an inch of cards stapled together. I went through the children’s section of the Ilsley Library that way, too, begging a ride to town as soon as I finished a book so I could read something else. I spent most of the money I earned at the Vermont Book Store, where the floorboards still creeeeak accusingly underfoot, even if you’re only looking for the next Sweet Valley High book.

That’s just who I was. It’s still who I am. But it was so uncool.

What I discovered in Pleasanton was that it was okay to want to study and be smart. No one thought I was weird for liking school. The cool kids were still athletes and cheerleaders — it was high school, after all — but those kids were also in my AP and honors classes, and sometimes they wore glasses! I didn’t necessarily fit in any better, but the ways in which I sometimes stood out didn’t make people snicker and call me a teacher’s pet. (Not that Foothill’s the World’s Best High School, but it was worlds away from where I started.)

Even when I went back to live with Mom for a bit in my 20s, there were…expectations. If I was at home, I was expected to be out in the kitchen or living room with everyone else, talking or watching TV, or talking over whatever was on TV. Reading in my room was considered rude, and Mom would come looking for me. I started knitting (before it was cool) just so I would have something to do in front of the TV, even though I would rather have just picked up a book.

What I might have noticed, had I continued to spend equal time with both sides of the family after the age of 10, is that I wasn’t weird at all, that my bookworminess and related curiosity just corresponded more to the other half of my DNA. It doesn’t make either side better or worse or smarter or dumber than the other…it just means I might not have felt the way I did as I got older.

My experience of my adolescent self might have been entirely different.

The decisions I made in the 90s — and the people who became part of my own little tribe — are my own, and I don’t regret them in any way. Part of building a family out of friends came of thinking that I needed to, though. That I was out of place in what I perceived as my family.

I wasn’t out of place at all…just out of touch.

Comment #33

There’s a comment on dooce.com referencing Dr. Horrible’s Sing-along Blog. In case I was previously unconvinced…this settles it:

I have found my [online] people.

I also consider this convincing evidence that G and I can coexist peaceably.

Two women, three kitties, and a love story

Well. It’s not really my love story to tell. For that, I refer you to The Story.

(Just so you know, Amy did perfect those cupcakes. I tested a number of them, just to be sure.)

This weekend, despite US Airways’s best efforts and with a little luck on the Bourne Bridge, I got to celebrate the happy couple with the rest of the family at my aunt and uncle’s place on Cape Cod.

I’ve written about marriage equality before, so I’ll skip that bit. I’ll skip posting my own pictures, too, because my card reader has gone missing (and it’s driving me teeth-grindingly nuts).

(Those pictures will come, though, because Uncle Andy took some of us sailing on the the bay on Sunday, and it was glorious.)

But here’s a nice one, courtesy of Aunt Marianne:

Amy and Kath have been a package deal for years — the first Christmas card/letter I ever got from Grown-up Katherine (two years younger than I and FINALLY 30 now) formally introduced Amy and their commitment. I wasn’t around when Kath came out, but I’d googled her one night while I was finishing up at AU and she was at Notre Dame. I figured she’d tell us when she was ready.

Now, their Christmas cards turn up annually, no doubt because Kath had the good sense to fall in love with someone who’s…well, less of a reserved Yankee. Amy blogs, for heaven’s sake.

Oh, and she knits! And bakes! And likes coffee! Obviously, I think she’s swell.

And she makes Katherine happier than I’ve ever known her to be, and more comfortably herself than I’ve seen since we were little. Even if Amy weren’t awesome in her own right, we couldn’t help but love her, just for that. Put it all together, and we’re lucky and proud to welcome her, formally, into the family.

Single White Female

There’s a fantastic discussion – at least up through the October 8 comments – happening over at Kate Harding’s Shapely Prose right now about why women are under no obligation to give men the benefit of the doubt. (You should go read what she says. It’s much more concise and generalizable than what I’m about to say.)

I don’t want to misconstrued. I’m quite fond of men — some of you are awesome, and I love one of you quite a bit, indeed. You are excellent friends and colleagues, and I am thankful for your basic decency in addition to your personalities. You respect me and consider my feelings and do not make me worry about my safety in your presence.

(In fact, if you’re reading this and you know me and you’re a guy…well, you’re probably (a) on my Christmas card list, and (b) a bigger feminist than I am. You are probably not the asshat who whistled at me from your car as I walked home from that concert last month.)

Unless I have a reason to feel safe in your presence, however, I will always be hyper-aware…to an extent that your own experience may make completely incomprehensible to you. And although it’s not personal, it is because I am a woman and you are a man.

Just so you know? If we’re already acquainted, making or laughing at misogynistic jokes will give me pause. It is not because I don’t have a sense of humor — it’s because jokes that dimish the humanity of any group of people are demoralizing and dangerous. I have no reason to think that’s funny.

(This is not an abstract principle to me — I married someone who thought a joke ending in “so she’ll match the dishwasher” was funny, then wondered why that “nice guy” expected me to do all the cooking and cleaning, preferrably while he slept in.)

(Bonus: I also paid most of the bills — yay, women’s lib!)

“Schrodinger’s Rapist” is how the author sums it up – there is no way a woman can know before interacting with a man whether he is a threat. If he is, she will not know until she is already in danger. It’s not “you’re a rapist until proven otherwise,” it’s “what is my risk in this situation?”

Starling, the author, does a great job of explaining in plain language what may go through a woman’s mind if a man initiates contact at random out in the world, why that train of thought occurs and is legitimate, and why you should respect it.

To be clear, this is about boy/girl stranger danger, not “all rape and assault dangers” — most victims are assaulted someone they know…although how else do people get to know other people? This is about how women move through the world vigilantly, maybe even fearfully, and how men (nice guys, in particular) may not understand.

I do move vigilantly, and I am much more vigilant when I am alone…which, let’s be frank, is most of the time. I was raised with a healthy understanding of what bad men do to women and girls — a great-uncle I never knew died in prison for doing just that (long before I was born, but it influenced how I was raised).

Most of my alertness started in college. There was a wave of assaults on female college students that year, particularly at the local community colleges. I was issued a “rape whistle” — back when “TWEET” meant “help!” I guess? Professors encouraged night students to travel in pairs or groups, preferrably with a male escort (which I found offensive and naive). I took a lot of night classes…I became watchful.

Make no mistake — most women are watchful. We are watchful because we are taught by our culture (by our mothers, by our colleges…) that we are responsible for our physical and sexual safety. There are endless programs, lessons, and old wives’ tales teaching women to try not to get raped; we’re told to learn self-defense and be careful and not dress provocatively or “give mixed signals”…such as being friendly and then saying no.

Teaching our sons to respect all people and not assume they have some kind of right to or over women is left up to parents. The continuing “boys will be boys” acceptance of bad, bullying, and outright criminal behavior perpetuates an environment in which I feel…wary.

Somehow, through all these years of civilization, we have not eliminated rape and sexual assault (against anyone). We have not found a way to teach all people that others’ bodies (and attention) are their own and do not exist for someone else’s pleasure or to meet their needs. Instead, we teach women and girls, the most likely victims, to be vigilant: Read more »

Pretty, purposeful things

Zakhar Sasim, the artist who painted the small piece in my living room had a booth at Art on the Avenue last week. I was in there looking at some of his smaller prints, and a woman asked him for the price of one of his large originals, which is about twice the size of the painting I own.

“Five hundred,” he replied.

“Five hundred DOLLARS?!”

He nodded. She shook her head in disgust and walked away. I was so disgusted by her disgust that I didn’t run after her to tell her he might be open to negotiation — he cut me a deal last year at Eastern Market.

It could be the influence of my yuppie neighborhood, but I don’t think $50o for a large original painting is exorbitant. I put a fairly high premium on simple things that delight me. I mean, I’m unlikely to empty my bank account because I’m in love with a piece, but most of the artists I’ve known have undervalued their work, not overvalued it. If it isn’t worth $500 to you, that doesn’t mean it isn’t worth $500…or more.

***

Some artsy stuff I’ve been seeing and/or coveting:

I’ve etsystalked JMJStudio for a while — the use of color and the romance of the paintings just caught me. I don’t know when they started doing Braille paintings, but I’m a fan.

Autumn fire – all of my favorite colors in one 2′ x 2′ space…

Family trees are one thing, but how about a wedding guest tree that shows how you and your fiance are related to everyone at the party. No extra charge for snark: “Bride’s mother’s boss,” “B-list friend from junior college,” “Cousin and turnabout-is-fair-play bridesmaid.”